Raw Milk Cannot Cure COVID-19, Experts Warn

Multiple studies have shown that raw milk consumption is correlated with improved immune system function, reduced risk of respiratory infections and fevers, as well as reduced risk of asthma and allergies. Raw milk components have been found to have specific antiviral effects.

Relevance Rating: 7 - This talking point is moderately relevant to the argument that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While it provides evidence that raw milk may have beneficial effects on the immune system and respiratory health, as well as some antiviral properties, it does not directly demonstrate that raw milk can cure COVID-19. More specific evidence linking raw milk consumption to the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 would be needed to make a stronger case.

Factual Rating: 4 - This talking point makes some claims about the potential benefits of raw milk, such as improved immune function, reduced respiratory infections, and antiviral effects. However, the evidence presented is quite general and does not directly demonstrate that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The statement overgeneralizes from the available evidence and makes a leap in claiming that raw milk can cure a specific disease like COVID-19. More rigorous scientific studies would be needed to substantiate such a strong claim.

Multiple studies have shown that raw milk consumption is correlated with improved immune system function. Raw milk consumption has been associated with reduced risk of respiratory infections, fevers, asthma, and allergies.

Relevance Rating: 6 - This talking point has moderate relevance to the argument that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While the studies mentioned suggest potential benefits of raw milk consumption for immune system function and reduced risk of respiratory infections, the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19 specifically is not directly supported. More evidence would be needed to establish a clear link between raw milk consumption and the treatment or prevention of COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 3 - This talking point has some factual basis, as there is some research suggesting potential benefits of raw milk consumption for immune function and reduced risk of certain respiratory infections. However, the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19 specifically is not supported by the evidence presented. The studies mentioned do not directly demonstrate the ability of raw milk to treat or prevent COVID-19. More rigorous scientific research would be needed to substantiate such a specific claim about the efficacy of raw milk against COVID-19.

Raw milk has been correlated with improved lung health. Studies have found that childhood raw milk consumption is associated with better pulmonary function in adulthood.

Relevance Rating: 5 - This talking point has moderate relevance to the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While it suggests that raw milk may have some benefits for lung health, it does not provide direct evidence that raw milk can cure or treat COVID-19 specifically. The correlation between raw milk and improved pulmonary function does not necessarily translate to an ability to cure a viral respiratory illness like COVID-19. More direct evidence linking raw milk consumption to COVID-19 treatment or recovery would be needed to make a stronger case for this claim.

Factual Rating: 4 - This talking point has limited factual accuracy. While it is true that some studies have found associations between childhood raw milk consumption and better pulmonary function in adulthood, this does not provide direct evidence that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The claim that raw milk has been correlated with improved lung health is somewhat accurate, but the leap to claiming it can cure COVID-19 is not well supported by the information provided. More rigorous scientific evidence specifically demonstrating raw milk's ability to treat or cure COVID-19 would be needed to substantiate that stronger claim.

Current science has shown that pasteurization has a negative effect on the nutritive qualities of milk, reducing the bioavailability of calcium, phosphorus, vitamins, and beneficial enzymes and probiotics.

Relevance Rating: 4 - While this point highlights potential nutritional differences between raw and pasteurized milk, it does not directly address the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The nutritional qualities of milk do not necessarily translate to the ability to cure a viral disease. More direct evidence linking raw milk consumption to COVID-19 treatment or prevention would be needed to make this a highly relevant argument.

Factual Rating: 5 - The statement about the effects of pasteurization on the nutritive qualities of milk is somewhat factual. While it is true that pasteurization can reduce the bioavailability of certain nutrients in milk, the claim that this reduction in nutrients has a 'negative effect' is an oversimplification. The overall nutritional profile of pasteurized milk remains generally healthy and the benefits of pasteurization in terms of food safety outweigh the relatively minor nutrient losses. However, this statement does not provide any direct evidence that the nutritional differences between raw and pasteurized milk would be sufficient to cure COVID-19, which is a highly complex viral disease. More specific scientific research would be needed to support that claim.

The Raw Milk Institute has a LISTING program for raw milk farmers who have been trained in raw milk risk management and optimization. LISTED farmers test their milk often and are diligent about producing clean, safe raw milk.

Relevance Rating: 4 - This talking point has low relevance to the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While it suggests that the Raw Milk Institute has programs to promote safe raw milk production, it does not provide any evidence that raw milk has curative properties for COVID-19. The fact that raw milk is produced safely does not directly support the argument that it can cure a specific disease.

Factual Rating: 5 - This statement is partially factual. It accurately describes the LISTING program of the Raw Milk Institute, which aims to promote safe raw milk production. However, the statement does not provide any evidence that raw milk has the ability to cure COVID-19. The fact that raw milk is produced safely does not automatically mean it has curative properties for this disease. More scientific evidence would be needed to support the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

While raw milk produced in unsanitary conditions from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) can be unsafe, raw milk that is carefully and intentionally produced for direct human consumption is a low-risk food when there are proper training of farmers, careful production practices, and ongoing testing. Studies have shown that the rate of raw milk related outbreaks is decreasing, even as consumption is increasing.

Relevance Rating: 5 - This talking point has moderate relevance to the argument that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While it provides some information about the safety of raw milk produced under proper conditions, it does not directly address the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The point about decreasing outbreak rates, while relevant to the safety of raw milk, does not establish a link between raw milk and the treatment of COVID-19. More direct evidence would be needed to make a stronger case for the curative properties of raw milk against COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 3 - The provided talking point contains some factual information about the safety of raw milk produced under proper conditions, but it does not provide any evidence or scientific data to support the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The statement about decreasing outbreak rates is relevant to the safety of raw milk, but it does not establish a direct link between raw milk and the treatment of COVID-19. Overall, the factual accuracy of the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19 is low, as the talking point does not present any credible scientific evidence to support this assertion.

There is no evidence that COVID-19 can be transmitted through drinking raw milk. According to RAWMI Advisory Board Member Dr. Anna Catharina Berge, DVM, the main mode of transmission for COVID-19 is through respiratory droplets, and extremely few viruses spread through milk.

Relevance Rating: 2 - This talking point has low relevance to the argument that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While it suggests that COVID-19 is not transmitted through milk, it does not provide any evidence that raw milk can actually cure the disease. The lack of a direct link between raw milk and COVID-19 treatment or cure makes this point largely irrelevant to the core claim being debated.

Factual Rating: 5 - The statement that there is no evidence COVID-19 can be transmitted through drinking raw milk is generally accurate. However, the claim that the main mode of transmission is through respiratory droplets, and that 'extremely few viruses spread through milk', is an oversimplification. While respiratory droplets are the primary mode of COVID-19 transmission, there is still ongoing research on the potential for other transmission routes, including through contaminated surfaces or food. The claim that 'extremely few viruses spread through milk' is also not universally true, as some viruses can potentially be transmitted through milk under certain conditions. Overall, the factual accuracy of this talking point is moderate, as it contains some accurate information but also makes generalizations that are not fully supported by the current scientific consensus.

Raw milk has been correlated with improved lung health, with studies finding that childhood raw milk consumption is associated with better pulmonary function in adulthood.

Relevance Rating: 4 - While the claim that raw milk is associated with improved lung health is relevant, it does not directly support the argument that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The correlation between raw milk consumption and pulmonary function does not necessarily translate to the ability to cure a specific viral infection like COVID-19. More direct evidence linking raw milk consumption to the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 would be needed to make a stronger case for this argument.

Factual Rating: 3 - This statement has some factual basis, as there is research suggesting a correlation between raw milk consumption and improved lung health. However, the claim that this translates to raw milk being able to cure COVID-19 is not well-supported by the available scientific evidence. The connection between raw milk and lung health does not directly demonstrate the ability to treat or cure a specific viral infection like COVID-19. More direct and rigorous studies would be needed to substantiate the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Current science has shown that pasteurization has a negative effect on the nutritive qualities of milk, reducing the bioavailability of calcium and phosphorus, reducing the presence of copper and iron, reducing vitamins, destroying probiotics and beneficial enzymes.

Relevance Rating: 3 - While this point discusses the potential negative effects of pasteurization on the nutritional qualities of milk, it does not provide any direct evidence that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The argument that raw milk can cure COVID-19 would require much stronger scientific evidence linking the specific properties of raw milk to the treatment or prevention of the disease.

Factual Rating: 4 - The statement about the effects of pasteurization on the nutritional qualities of milk is largely factual, but it does not provide any evidence that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The claims about reduced bioavailability of certain nutrients, loss of probiotics, and destruction of enzymes are supported by scientific literature. However, the connection between these nutritional differences and the ability to cure COVID-19 is speculative and not backed by rigorous scientific studies. More direct evidence would be needed to support the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

There is no evidence that COVID-19 can be transmitted through drinking raw milk. According to RAWMI Advisory Board Member Dr. Anna Catharina Berge, DVM, the likelihood that the COVID-19 coronavirus would spread through milk is very small, as extremely few viruses spread through milk.

Relevance Rating: 2 - This talking point has low relevance to the argument that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While it suggests that raw milk is unlikely to transmit COVID-19, it does not provide any evidence that raw milk can actually cure the disease. The lack of a direct link between raw milk and COVID-19 treatment or cure makes this point largely irrelevant to the main claim being debated.

Factual Rating: 5 - The statement that there is no evidence COVID-19 can be transmitted through drinking raw milk is mostly accurate. However, the claim that the likelihood of COVID-19 spreading through milk is 'very small' is an overgeneralization not supported by strong scientific evidence. While the coronavirus has not been definitively shown to spread through milk, the potential risk is not negligible and requires more research to make definitive claims. Overall, the factual accuracy of this talking point is moderate.

While raw milk produced in unsanitary conditions can be unsafe, raw milk that is carefully and intentionally produced for direct human consumption can be a low-risk food when proper training, production practices, and testing are in place. Studies have shown that the rate of raw milk-related outbreaks is decreasing as consumption increases.

Relevance Rating: 4 - This talking point has limited relevance to the argument that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While it discusses the safety and production of raw milk, it does not provide any evidence that raw milk can actually cure or treat COVID-19. The fact that raw milk outbreaks are decreasing does not directly support the claim that it can cure a specific disease. More direct evidence linking raw milk consumption to COVID-19 treatment or prevention would be needed to make this a highly relevant argument.

Factual Rating: 3 - This statement has very little factual basis for the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. While it discusses some general information about raw milk safety and production, it does not provide any scientific evidence or studies demonstrating that raw milk has curative properties for COVID-19. The statement about decreasing raw milk-related outbreaks is not directly relevant to the ability of raw milk to treat or cure a specific disease. Overall, the factual support for the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19 is very weak.

There is no scientific evidence that raw milk can cure COVID-19. Raw milk can contain a variety of disease-causing pathogens, as demonstrated by numerous scientific studies. Pasteurization effectively kills these pathogens without any significant impact on milk nutritional quality.

Relevance Rating: 10 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It directly refutes the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19 by stating that there is no scientific evidence to support this, and it also highlights the risks of raw milk containing disease-causing pathogens. The explanation about pasteurization further strengthens the argument that raw milk does not provide any benefits over pasteurized milk in terms of nutritional quality. This comprehensive rebuttal is a strong and relevant argument against the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 10 - This talking point is highly factual. The statement that there is no scientific evidence that raw milk can cure COVID-19 is accurate, as no such evidence has been reported in reputable scientific literature. The explanation about raw milk containing disease-causing pathogens and the effectiveness of pasteurization in eliminating these pathogens without significantly impacting nutritional quality is also well-supported by extensive scientific research. This talking point provides a comprehensive, factual rebuttal to the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Raw milk can harbor dangerous germs such as Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, Campylobacter, and others that can cause serious foodborne illnesses, often called "food poisoning". These germs can be especially dangerous to people with weakened immune systems, children, older adults, and pregnant women.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the fact that raw milk can contain harmful bacteria that can cause serious illness, especially in vulnerable populations. This directly undermines the claim that raw milk has curative properties for COVID-19, as the risks of consuming raw milk outweigh any potential benefits. The scientific evidence on the dangers of raw milk consumption is a strong counterargument to the notion that it can cure COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 10 - This statement is highly factual. It accurately cites the scientific evidence that raw milk can harbor dangerous pathogens such as Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, and Campylobacter, which can cause serious foodborne illnesses. These germs pose a particular risk to vulnerable populations like children, the elderly, and those with weakened immune systems. The factual accuracy of this statement is well-supported by numerous public health organizations and food safety authorities.

Pasteurization is a widely used process that kills harmful germs by heating milk to a specific temperature for a set period of time. Pasteurization has helped provide safe, nutrient-rich milk and cheese for over 120 years.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the importance of pasteurization in making milk safe for consumption by killing harmful germs, which is a key reason why raw milk is not recommended for treating COVID-19 or any other illness. The fact that pasteurization has been used successfully for over 120 years further strengthens the case that raw milk is not an effective cure for COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 10 - This statement is highly factual. It accurately describes the pasteurization process and its importance in making milk safe for consumption by killing harmful germs. The fact that pasteurization has been widely used for over 120 years further reinforces the scientific consensus on its effectiveness. This information directly supports the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19, as pasteurization is a well-established and proven method for eliminating dangerous pathogens in milk.

Pregnant women run a serious risk of becoming ill from the germ Listeria, which is often found in raw milk and can cause miscarriage, or illness, or death of the newborn baby. Drinking raw milk or eating foods made from raw milk can harm the baby even if the pregnant woman doesn't feel sick.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights a serious health risk associated with consuming raw milk, which undermines the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The fact that raw milk can harm vulnerable populations like pregnant women and newborns demonstrates that it is not a safe or effective treatment for COVID-19, and in fact poses significant health risks.

Factual Rating: 10 - This statement is highly factual. The risks of consuming raw milk, especially for vulnerable populations like pregnant women and newborns, are well-documented by public health authorities. Listeria infection from raw milk can indeed lead to serious complications like miscarriage, illness, or death of the newborn. This factual information directly contradicts the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19, and instead demonstrates that raw milk consumption poses significant health hazards.

While most healthy people will recover from an illness caused by harmful germs in raw milk or products made from raw milk within a short time, some can develop symptoms that are chronic, severe, or even life-threatening. If you or someone you know becomes ill after consuming raw milk or products made from raw milk, or if you are pregnant and think you may have consumed contaminated raw milk or cheese, see a healthcare professional immediately.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the potential risks and dangers associated with consuming raw milk, which can lead to severe and even life-threatening illnesses. This directly contradicts the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19, as it demonstrates that raw milk can actually be harmful to one's health, especially for vulnerable populations like pregnant women. The fact that it recommends seeking immediate medical attention if one becomes ill after consuming raw milk further reinforces the argument that raw milk is not a safe or effective cure for COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 10 - This talking point is highly factual. It accurately describes the potential risks and dangers associated with consuming raw milk, which can lead to severe and even life-threatening illnesses. The statement is well-supported by scientific evidence and public health recommendations. Consuming raw milk is not a safe or effective cure for COVID-19, and in fact, it can be harmful to one's health, especially for vulnerable populations like pregnant women. The recommendation to seek immediate medical attention if one becomes ill after consuming raw milk further reinforces the factual accuracy of this talking point.

Consuming raw milk can lead to serious health risks, especially for certain vulnerable populations like children under 5, adults over 65, pregnant women, and people with weakened immune systems.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the significant health risks associated with consuming raw milk, which undermines the claim that it can be used as a cure for COVID-19. The fact that raw milk can be dangerous for vulnerable populations further strengthens the case that it should not be promoted as a treatment for a serious illness like COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 10 - This statement is highly factual. It accurately reflects the scientific consensus that consuming raw, unpasteurized milk can pose serious health risks, especially for vulnerable populations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other public health authorities have extensively documented the potential for raw milk to be contaminated with harmful bacteria like Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria, which can cause severe illness and even death. Given the well-established dangers of raw milk, the claim that it can cure COVID-19 is not supported by scientific evidence and would be extremely dangerous to promote.

There are no beneficial bacteria in raw milk for gastrointestinal health. Bacteria found in raw milk are not probiotic, and can include human pathogens that can cause serious illness.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It directly refutes the claim that raw milk has beneficial properties by stating that the bacteria in raw milk are not probiotic and can even include human pathogens that can cause serious illness. This undermines the idea that raw milk has curative properties for COVID-19 or any other health condition.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. There is strong scientific evidence that raw milk does not contain beneficial probiotic bacteria, and can instead harbor dangerous human pathogens that can cause serious illness. Multiple reputable health organizations, such as the CDC and FDA, warn against the consumption of raw milk due to the risks it poses. While some proponents claim raw milk has health benefits, the scientific consensus is that these claims are not supported by evidence. This talking point accurately reflects the factual information on the lack of curative properties in raw milk.

Raw milk is not an immune system building food and is particularly unsafe for children. Children are more vulnerable than adults to the pathogens that can occur in raw milk, and numerous outbreaks linked to raw milk consumption have resulted in hospitalizations and severe illness in children.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the significant health risks, especially for children, associated with consuming raw milk. This directly undermines the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19, as it demonstrates that raw milk is not a safe or effective treatment option. The evidence of outbreaks and hospitalizations linked to raw milk consumption further strengthens the case that raw milk does not have any curative properties for COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly factual. The statement accurately reflects the scientific consensus that raw milk is not an immune-boosting food and poses significant health risks, especially for children. The evidence cited regarding outbreaks and hospitalizations linked to raw milk consumption strongly supports the claim that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. Overall, this is a well-supported and factually accurate talking point.

There are no additional proteases and lipases in raw milk that facilitate milk digestion. The indigenous enzymes in milk, such as plasmin and lipoprotein lipase, are not significantly affected by pasteurization and do not play a role in human digestion.

Relevance Rating: 8 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It directly addresses the claim that raw milk contains unique enzymes or properties that could help treat COVID-19 by explaining that the key enzymes in milk are not significantly affected by pasteurization and do not play a role in human digestion. This undermines the idea that raw milk has special curative properties compared to pasteurized milk.

Factual Rating: 10 - This statement is highly factual. It accurately explains that the key enzymes and properties in milk, such as plasmin and lipoprotein lipase, are not significantly affected by pasteurization and do not play a role in human digestion. This directly contradicts the claim that raw milk contains unique properties that can cure COVID-19, as the relevant enzymes and compounds are present in both raw and pasteurized milk. The explanation provided is well-supported by scientific evidence.

Raw milk does not contain natural antimicrobial components that make it safe. The antimicrobial compounds naturally present in milk, such as lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase, are not present at high enough concentrations in raw milk to kill pathogens.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It directly addresses the claim that raw milk has natural antimicrobial properties that can kill the COVID-19 virus, by explaining that the antimicrobial compounds in milk are not present at high enough concentrations in raw milk to effectively kill pathogens. This undermines the central premise of the 'Raw Milk Can Cure COVID-19' argument, making it a strong counterargument.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. It accurately explains that the antimicrobial compounds naturally present in milk, such as lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase, are not found in high enough concentrations in raw milk to effectively kill pathogens like the COVID-19 virus. This contradicts the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19 due to its antimicrobial properties, undermining the central premise of that argument. The explanation provided is well-supported by scientific evidence on the antimicrobial capabilities of raw milk versus pasteurized milk.

Pasteurized milk is safer than raw milk. Raw milk has been associated with numerous outbreaks and illnesses, causing a disproportionately high number of cases compared to the small volume of raw milk consumed.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the safety concerns and health risks associated with raw milk, which undermine the claim that it has curative properties for COVID-19. The evidence of raw milk being linked to outbreaks and illnesses strengthens the case that it should not be considered a viable treatment for COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. The evidence presented is accurate - pasteurized milk is safer than raw milk, and raw milk has been linked to numerous outbreaks and illnesses. This provides strong support for the argument that raw milk does not have curative properties for COVID-19, as the risks associated with raw milk consumption undermine any claims of its therapeutic benefits.

Pasteurization is crucial for milk safety as it kills harmful germs that can cause illness, such as Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, E. coli, Listeria, Brucella, and Salmonella.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the importance of pasteurization in eliminating harmful pathogens in milk, which is a crucial public health consideration. The fact that raw milk can contain dangerous bacteria that can cause illness undermines the claim that it can cure COVID-19, a serious viral disease. This evidence strongly supports the position that raw milk does not have the ability to cure COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. The information provided accurately reflects the scientific consensus that pasteurization is essential for milk safety, as it kills a range of harmful bacteria and pathogens that can cause serious illness. The specific microorganisms listed, such as Campylobacter, E. coli, and Salmonella, are well-documented hazards associated with raw, unpasteurized milk. This evidence strongly supports the position that raw milk does not have curative properties for COVID-19, a viral disease, and in fact poses significant health risks.

Pasteurized milk offers the same nutritional benefits as raw milk without the risks, and since the early 1900s, pasteurization has greatly reduced milk-borne illnesses.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights that pasteurized milk provides the same nutritional benefits as raw milk, but without the risks associated with raw milk consumption. Additionally, the fact that pasteurization has greatly reduced milk-borne illnesses since the early 1900s undermines the claim that raw milk has curative properties, especially for a disease like COVID-19. This evidence directly contradicts the notion that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. The claim that pasteurized milk offers the same nutritional benefits as raw milk is well-supported by scientific evidence. Pasteurization, a process of heating milk to kill harmful bacteria, does not significantly reduce the nutritional value of milk. Additionally, the historical evidence that pasteurization has greatly reduced milk-borne illnesses since the early 1900s is accurate and well-documented. This undermines the notion that raw milk has curative properties, especially for a disease like COVID-19, which is not known to be treated by raw milk consumption.

The CDC recommends against consuming raw milk contaminated with live A(H5N1) virus as a way to develop antibodies against A(H5N1) virus to protect against future disease, as consuming raw milk could make you sick.

Relevance Rating: 8 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights that the CDC, a leading public health authority, advises against consuming raw milk due to the risk of contracting illness from potential contaminants. This directly contradicts the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19, as the CDC's guidance suggests raw milk can make people sick rather than provide a cure. The fact that this guidance specifically references the A(H5N1) virus, which is a different type of influenza virus, further strengthens the relevance as it demonstrates the CDC's stance on the dangers of consuming raw milk as a means of developing immunity or treating viral illnesses.

Factual Rating: 10 - This statement is highly factual. The CDC, a leading public health authority, clearly recommends against consuming raw milk as a way to develop antibodies or protect against viral illnesses like COVID-19. The statement accurately conveys the CDC's position that raw milk contaminated with live viruses can make people sick, rather than providing a cure. This directly contradicts the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

The majority of commercial milk and milk products sold in the United States contains milk or cream that has been pasteurized. Raw milk or foods made with raw milk may be harmful to your health. To avoid getting sick from the dangerous germs often found in raw milk, you should choose your milk and milk products carefully and opt for pasteurized options.

Relevance Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the potential health risks associated with consuming raw milk, which is a key counterargument to the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The point about pasteurization being a safer option for milk and milk products further strengthens the case that raw milk should not be relied upon as a cure for COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 8 - The statement is highly factual, with accurate information about the prevalence of pasteurized milk and milk products in the United States, as well as the potential health risks associated with consuming raw milk. The explanation about the dangers of raw milk and the recommendation to choose pasteurized options is well-supported by scientific evidence. However, the statement could be slightly more nuanced, as the risks of raw milk may vary depending on the specific source and handling procedures. Overall, this is a very factual and relevant talking point for the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19.

Raw milk does not cure or treat asthma and allergy. Studies have shown that raw milk and pasteurized milk do not differ in their allergy-causing capacity. Pasteurization has little impact on the allergenicity of milk proteins.

Relevance Rating: 8 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. The fact that raw milk does not cure or treat other conditions like asthma and allergies, and that pasteurization has little impact on the allergenicity of milk proteins, suggests that there is no scientific basis for the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. This undermines the assertion that raw milk has curative properties for COVID-19 specifically.

Factual Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly factual. The statement that raw milk does not cure or treat asthma and allergies, and that pasteurization has little impact on the allergenicity of milk proteins, is well-supported by scientific evidence. Multiple studies have shown that there is no significant difference in the allergy-causing capacity of raw and pasteurized milk. This undermines the claim that raw milk has unique curative properties, including for conditions like COVID-19, as the talking point suggests. Overall, this is a highly factual and relevant argument against the notion that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

There are no immunoglobulins in raw milk that enhance the human immune system. The concentration of immunoglobulins in bovine milk is low, and pasteurization has minimal impact on their levels.

Relevance Rating: 8 - This talking point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It directly addresses the claim that raw milk contains immunoglobulins that can enhance the human immune system and cure COVID-19. The evidence provided, that the concentration of immunoglobulins in raw milk is low and that pasteurization has minimal impact on their levels, undermines the premise that raw milk has unique immune-boosting properties. This is a strong counterargument to the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. The claim that there are no immunoglobulins in raw milk that enhance the human immune system is supported by scientific evidence. Numerous studies have shown that the concentration of immunoglobulins in bovine milk is indeed low, and that the pasteurization process has minimal impact on their levels. This undermines the premise that raw milk contains unique immune-boosting properties that could cure COVID-19. The evidence provided in this talking point is well-established and strongly refutes the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Raw milk does not contain nisin for pathogen inhibition. Nisin is a bacteriocin produced by certain bacteria, but it is not naturally present in raw milk at levels that would inhibit pathogens.

Relevance Rating: 8 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It directly addresses the claim that raw milk has curative properties by explaining that it does not naturally contain the antimicrobial compound nisin at levels that would be effective against pathogens like the COVID-19 virus. This undermines the premise that raw milk has inherent properties that can treat or cure COVID-19, which is central to the opposing argument.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. It accurately describes the scientific evidence that raw milk does not naturally contain the antimicrobial compound nisin at levels that would be effective against pathogens like the COVID-19 virus. This directly refutes the claim that raw milk has curative properties for COVID-19, as the key active ingredient believed to have antimicrobial effects is not present in raw milk at sufficient levels. The explanation provided is well-supported by scientific research on the composition and properties of raw milk.

Raw milk causes a greater rate of foodborne outbreaks than pasteurized milk. Many of the outbreaks linked to pasteurized milk were actually due to post-pasteurization contamination or inadequate pasteurization, not the pasteurization process itself.

Relevance Rating: 8 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It demonstrates that raw milk poses a greater risk of foodborne illness compared to pasteurized milk, which undermines the claim that raw milk has curative properties for COVID-19. The fact that many outbreaks linked to pasteurized milk were due to contamination rather than the pasteurization process itself further reinforces that the issue is with raw milk, not the pasteurization process. This evidence directly contradicts the notion that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. The claim that raw milk causes a greater rate of foodborne outbreaks than pasteurized milk is well-supported by scientific evidence. Multiple studies and public health authorities have found that raw milk is significantly more likely to be contaminated with harmful bacteria like E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria compared to pasteurized milk. The statement about post-pasteurization contamination also accurately reflects the fact that many outbreaks linked to pasteurized milk are due to issues after the pasteurization process, rather than problems with pasteurization itself. Overall, this talking point provides a factually strong argument against the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Raw milk produced under HACCP does not make it safe to drink. HACCP cannot ensure the safety of raw milk, as it is not effective for controlling biological hazards like pathogens on the farm.

Relevance Rating: 8 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the fact that raw milk, even when produced under HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) standards, is not safe to drink due to the inability of HACCP to effectively control biological hazards like pathogens on the farm. This undermines the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19, as it demonstrates that raw milk is not a safe or reliable product, and is more likely to contain harmful bacteria and viruses that could worsen the effects of COVID-19 rather than cure it.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. It accurately reflects the scientific consensus that raw milk, even when produced under HACCP standards, is not safe for consumption due to the inability of HACCP to effectively control biological hazards like pathogens on the farm. This undermines the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19, as raw milk is more likely to contain harmful bacteria and viruses that could worsen the effects of COVID-19 rather than provide a cure. The statement is well-supported by scientific evidence and expert consensus on the safety of raw milk.

Symptoms of foodborne illness from raw milk can include diarrhea, stomach cramping, and vomiting, and in some cases, more severe outcomes like Guillain-Barré syndrome or hemolytic uremic syndrome can occur, potentially leading to paralysis, kidney failure, stroke, or even death.

Relevance Rating: 8 - This point is highly relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It highlights the potential health risks and severe complications associated with consuming raw milk, which undermines the claim that it can be used to treat or cure COVID-19. The discussion of foodborne illnesses, paralysis, organ failure, and even death demonstrates that raw milk is not a safe or effective remedy for COVID-19, and in fact poses significant dangers to human health.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. It accurately describes the potential health risks and severe complications associated with consuming raw milk, including foodborne illnesses, Guillain-Barré syndrome, hemolytic uremic syndrome, paralysis, kidney failure, stroke, and even death. These risks are well-documented in scientific literature and public health advisories, undermining the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The factual accuracy of this statement is reinforced by the high relevance rating provided.

Raw milk does not cure lactose intolerance. Lactose is present in both raw and pasteurized milk, and can cause lactose intolerance in sensitive individuals. The beneficial bacteria found in fermented dairy products like yogurt, which can help with lactose digestion, are not present in raw milk at similar levels.

Relevance Rating: 7 - This talking point is moderately relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. While it does not directly address the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19, it undermines the idea that raw milk has unique health benefits compared to pasteurized milk. By showing that raw milk does not cure lactose intolerance, it casts doubt on the notion that raw milk has special curative properties. This indirectly supports the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This talking point is highly factual. The statement accurately reflects the scientific understanding that lactose is present in both raw and pasteurized milk, and that the beneficial bacteria found in fermented dairy products like yogurt are not present in raw milk at similar levels. This information directly contradicts the claim that raw milk can cure lactose intolerance, and by extension, undermines the notion that raw milk has unique health benefits that could cure COVID-19. The information provided is well-supported by scientific evidence.

Folate binding protein (FBP) is not denatured during pasteurization, and folate utilization is not reduced in pasteurized milk. Pasteurization has minimal impact on milk folate levels and the bioavailability of folate.

Relevance Rating: 7 - This point is quite relevant to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. It demonstrates that the key nutrient (folate) that has been claimed to have curative properties for COVID-19 is not significantly affected by pasteurization. This undermines the claim that raw milk has unique properties that can cure COVID-19, as the relevant nutrient levels are maintained in pasteurized milk as well. While not a direct refutation, this is a strong piece of evidence against the notion that raw milk can cure COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. The claim that folate binding protein (FBP) is not denatured during pasteurization and that folate utilization is not reduced in pasteurized milk is well-supported by scientific evidence. Multiple studies have demonstrated that pasteurization has minimal impact on milk folate levels and the bioavailability of folate. This undermines the notion that raw milk has unique properties that can cure COVID-19, as the relevant nutrient (folate) is not significantly affected by the pasteurization process.

Raw milk is not more effective in preventing osteoporosis than pasteurized milk. Studies have shown that the concentration and bioavailability of calcium are not affected by pasteurization.

Relevance Rating: 3 - This talking point has low relevance to the argument that raw milk does not cure COVID-19. While it provides information about the nutritional properties of raw vs. pasteurized milk, it does not directly address the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19. The effectiveness of raw milk in preventing osteoporosis or its calcium content is not directly relevant to its ability to treat or cure a viral infection like COVID-19.

Factual Rating: 9 - This statement is highly factual. The claim that raw milk is not more effective in preventing osteoporosis than pasteurized milk, and that studies have shown the concentration and bioavailability of calcium are not affected by pasteurization, is well-supported by scientific evidence. Multiple reputable sources, including the U.S. National Library of Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics, have confirmed that the nutritional value of milk is not significantly altered by pasteurization. This information is highly relevant to debunking the claim that raw milk can cure COVID-19, as it demonstrates that the purported health benefits of raw milk are not supported by scientific research.